Giant Crack in Africa Will Create a New Ocean

[JADE]

Roses, most folks that worship science instead of just use it to figure out what might have happened believe that everything just happened(big bang theory) or even that two planets crashed into each other and that's where we came from. All are just theories and are so far from being provable that it's not funny. But they will stand by their "religion" with such faith as they condemn other religions as being silly. Hypocrisy is the best word to fit here. They can't prove their theory any more than we can prove ours, both are by faith and faith alone.

[Titus]

Originally Posted by eyewtkas

Is this your way of admitting your were wrong?

Ummm... no. But I will re-read it, if you'll read a chapter of the Bible. How about John 3?

[eyewtkas]

Originally Posted by Titus

Ummm... no. But I will re-read it, if you'll read a chapter of the Bible. How about John 3?

I'll tell you what Titus, don't bother. It's not going to change the fact that you're completely wrong, is it? You're obviously more interested in being deliberately obtuse.

[eyewtkas]

Originally Posted by Roses

I am quite suprised that you are unfamiliar with how scientists think of this world. Scientists believed that this earth was created through an intense process that took millions of years, that humans themselves were created as a result of evolution that took millions of years to happen, if you read thousands upon thousands of scientific articles released it holds no room for great shifts or movements in the world to occur within a few seconds because they think this world has gone through and is going through changes that takes millions of years to occur.

You seem to be determined to link the big bang and evolution etc. with movements in the Earth. I'm not aware of any scientific basis for this. If you were to disprove any one of those theories it would not invalidate the others.

So therefore scientists are saying there is prove that the earth is millions of years old when in truth and reality those shifts, rifts and movements in the world are quite capable of occuring within a shorter period of time than they want to think.

Obviously they don't necessarily think that given, among other things, the findings of the OP article. Further, there is much better proof for the age of the Earth than land shifts etc.

But obviously they don't want to admit that because they do not want to say anything that can show the reality that God created this world. Just recently Nasa said that earth would not be impacted by any serious meteorite at this moment in time yet still a meteorite which scientists didn't expect or saw or was prepared for came towards Indonesia and if it did not break up would have caused loss of life. Because guess what scientists believe that major meteorites are years away from impacting earth which in reality it is not.

You also stated that the hand in space means nothing and it is just like shapes in the clouds. If that is the case then how on earth can clouds form intelligent shapes then, shapes of animals, shapes of bears etc, doesn't scientists consider the world to be mechanical and random, how on earth can in outer space you have the shape of a human hand, an intelligent shape.

There's nothing intelligent about it, it's purely random.

[Titus]

Originally Posted by eyewtkas

I'll tell you what Titus, don't bother. It's not going to change the fact that you're completely wrong, is it? You're obviously more interested in being deliberately obtuse.

Actually I'm more interested in you reading the Bible. If you do I promise to re-read the article and publicly admit if I am wrong.

[eyewtkas]

Originally Posted by Titus

Actually I'm more interested in you reading the Bible. If you do I promise to re-read the article and publicly admit if I am wrong.

I've already read it thanks Titus. Not that it has anything to do with this discussion of course. Nice diversion attempt though.